Should Christians attend AI church services?

Increased reliance upon artificial intelligence has resulted in some churches offering AI generated church services which include digital avatars presenting an AI created message. While this is probably a gimmick and a fad that will not continue long, the fact that any church is willing to use artificial intelligence in this fashion reveals a deficient understanding of the nature of the church gathering. This deficiency is not surprising given the large number of Christians who consider watching church online to be a sufficient substitute for church attendance. Mega and multi-site churches have long been streaming the preferred preacher to various locations so each church can watch the sermon preached from the large screen display. Looking back, the jump from an online gathering and a digital pastor to an experience crafted by algorithms seems inevitable.

Church is not about an experience. Church is not primarily about being exposed to a certain body of content. Church is a gathering of Christians. (First Corinthians 11:18) If Christians do not come together, then there is no church. A church is a gathering of believers using their spiritual gifts together to promote Christian growth in all the believers in that body. (Ephesians 4:11-15) This kind of Holy Spirit dependent and Holy Spirit filled ministry cannot be achieved by any artificial or mechanical means. The church gathering is a time for Christians to sing together in a manner that teaches and admonishes one another. (Colossians 3:16) This requires people be present and engaged with each other. The gathering is a time to hear the reading, explanation and application of the Word of God (1 Timothy 4:13) from a Holy Spirit gifted and Holy Spirit filled preacher. (2 Timothy 1:6)

No computer is filled with the Holy Spirit. No computer program can have or will ever have the spiritual gifts of teaching, exhortation or encouragement. A well written computer program may be able to craft an impressive lesson which employs language and grammar far beyond the ability of the average preacher. However, spiritual change is never accomplished by the skill of an author or speaker. Spiritual change only occurs when the The Holy Spirit applies the Word of God to the life of the person. The God appointed means for teaching the Word is a Spirit filled teacher. Can the Holy Spirit use an artificially generated sermon in someone’s life? Sure. He used a donkey to open the eyes of a false prophet, (Numbers 22:24-31) and He used a false prophet to proclaim great blessings on Israel. (Numbers 24)

God can use any means He chooses to accomplish His will, but Christians are obligated to purse the ordinary means God has given to the church for its growth. (First Corinthians 1:21) No one should not look to artificially generated fellowship, singing or preaching as the means for their Christian growth. God designed Christians to gather in person with other human beings, to hear a God appointed man preach the Word of God. Church is not entertainment. Church is not mere content. Church is not an experience. The church is a gathering of Christians for Christian fellowship. That cannot be duplicated by algorithms and avatars.

Was Noah’s flood local?

For many decades scientists, skeptics and certain scholars have said the Genesis account of Noah’s flood is the story of a large local flood not a worldwide flood. Does a local, megaflood match the Biblical description found in Genesis chapters 6-8. The short answer is no. The Bible describes a world wide flood that covered all regions of the globe.

The Bible represents the flood in Noah’s day as a historical fact and the Biblical description of this flood indicate the flood was global. The Bible clearly says the flood covered all the mountains on the earth. (Genesis 7:20) Scripture says the flood waters were 45 feet higher than the tallest mountains. Everyone knows water runs to the lowest point. For water to climber higher than all the mountains it must have covered the earth. Only when the water had no where else to go could it begin to rise to the heights described in Scripture.

God’s stated purpose in the flood was to destroy all air breathing life on the earth except those on the ark. “So the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.” (Genesis 6:7) “And God said to Noah, The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence through them; and behold, I will destroy them with the earth.” (Genesis 6:13) “I will destroy from the face of the earth all living things that I have made.” (Genesis 7:4) God did not declare destruction on a region or a nation, but on the entire world. For God’s purpose to be fulfilled the flood had to be global.

Furthermore, ample evidence exists showing the earth was once entirely covered with water. The clearest evidence is the layers of rock found on every continent. Most of these layers are made up of sedimentary rocks. Sedimentary rock is the name scientists have given to rock formed in water by grains of sand or other mineral sinking to the bottom and being compressed together to form stone. The global presence of sedimentary rock is evidence of a global catastrophe which covered the earth with water.

The only way anyone could read the Bible and conclude it is referring to a local flood is to first believe the Bible is a collection of myths. The mythologizing of Biblical history undermines all of Scripture, even if the myths are believed to have spiritual value because they teach important lessons about God and man. For example, if the flood was local, then what exactly is the nature of God’s promise in Genesis 8:21, “I will never again curse the ground for man’s sake, although the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living thing as I have done”? If the story of Noah is a myth, is God’s promise a myth? Is the promise to be understand as a promise to not judge people? Is the promise a fable showing that God is merciful? What mercy is there if the wicked men, the judgment, the deliverance and the promise are all myths? If Noah’s flood is not true as described in the Bible, how would anyone know if any of the rest of the Bible true? Treating Biblical history as myth makes the Bible nonsensical, incomprehensible and ultimately worthless. Only by believing God’s Word to contain the literal records of actual history can any one understand or believe what God has said.

Does the Shroud of Turin show the face of Jesus?

In April of 2023 an artist created a realistic, life sized representation of the body of Jesus based on the Shroud of Turin. In September a computer generated a depiction of Jesus’ face, also based upon the Shroud of Turin. Such images are intriguing, but can they be trusted as accurate representations of what Jesus looked like?

The accuracy of recent artwork is dependent not only on the skill of the artist, but also on the genuineness of the Shroud of Turin. No accurate image of Jesus can be developed from the imprints on the shroud if the Shroud of Turin is not what it is claimed to be. The Shroud of Turin is claimed to be the burial cloth which was wrapped around Jesus before His burial. The shroud appears to have in it the image of a man. Many believe the image to be of Jesus. As a result, the Shroud of Turin is held sacred by millions.

Much controversy surrounds the shroud’s authenticity. The earliest historical references to the Shroud of Turin come from the mid-1300’s. No one knows where the shroud was before that time or how its discoverer came to find it. The lack of any reliable record of the shroud’s existence before the 1300’s is troubling and should limit dogmatic claims that it is truly the burial cloth of Jesus.

The Biblical and historical records from the first two centuries of Christianity show no evidence Christians ever revered any objects associated with Jesus’ life. The first mention of the preserving of Christian relics is from a document which claims to have been written in 120 AD and relates to Christians keeping the bones of Ignatius of Antioch. If Christians kept as relics the bones of Ignatius that is not proof anyone 90 years earlier kept objects related to Jesus, preserved those items or passed them down as sacred relics. If such relics had been kept one would expect some mention of them in the earliest writings of Christians.

Christian’s keeping and revering objects related to Christ’s death or burial seems unlikely given the clearly stated understanding of the apostles regarding the presence of Christ with them. They had no need to keep a splinter from the cross, the holy grail, the crown of thorns or the head of the spear which pierced Jesus’ side. They knew the real presence of Christ was dwelling in them by the Holy Spirit. They understood Christ’s promise, “You will know that I am in the Father, and you in Me, and I in you” (John 14:20) is fulfilled by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Christ. Christ lives in those who have His Spirit. (Romans 8:9-10) The early Christians had no need for relics of Jesus because they knew He was residing in them.

Today, artifacts and relics are ultimately unnecessary to the Christian. No artifact, even if it be proven to be from the time of Christ, will convince those who do not believe the Bible. Those who do believe the gospel may find their faith corroborated by historical items which show the accuracy of Scripture, but their faith is not based upon archaeological discoveries or sacred relics. The faith of the Christian rests on the Word of God alone.